If they have/had no interest in football why did they spend if tales are to be believed best part of £250mil on transfers and wages
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prediction on league finish
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostIf they have/had no interest in football why did they spend if tales are to be believed best part of £250mil on transfers and wages
Of course they had interest.
They bought a premiership league club. Uncle was at every home game while we were in the prem, money (lots of) was spent.
A culmination of relegation and debt along with ffp has quenched his thirst for all things qpr.
Also remember his statement soon after buying us that we were an advertising veichle for his air Asia company.
Either way his interest now is property and management along with his planes.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Went for mid table. Might be a touch optimistic on the basis we actually play our better players, especially Sylla who can score!! Play to a system that best suits what we have to get the best out of them, do a little bit of coaching and play as a team. If we carry on like we ended the last season with a different team and a slightly different way to hoof it to Smith.... Yeah I'll be very worried
Comment
-
This myth of spending 250 million is a load of crap as our highest transfer fee was under 10 million up front so not going along with that we spent that amount. He has overseen the biggest wastage in English Football history and is now looking to claw back anyway he can. Remember he tried to get East London pre Olympic redevelopment and the David's of WHU would not sell.
Comment
-
Good honest hard working team full of cheap chestbeaters. And Ollie in charge. We´ll pi$$ the league.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Nick View Postbottom end of the table is what im thinking. be amazed if we get mid table tbh... be over the moon to be proved wrong, but just cant see it.
Good to see your still about buddy.
Hope you and yours are keeping well 👍nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View Postyou seem to be on the minority on here with your unwavering support for Ollie, even though the blundering tool almost relegated QPR last season with 17 defeats from 30 games!
Comment
-
Originally posted by rickyranger View PostYour unwavering support of Holloway in the face of evidence to the contrary is admirable, but you must be either related or the man himself.
Just for the record a few teams with low budgets challenged last year, Huddersfield and Reading being examples, albeit both had switched on, forward thinking managers.
In football if you have money to spend you have a chance whoever manages you, hence the never ending merry go round of failed ex players. If you don't have money you need a switched on manager/coach to maximize your players. Unfortunately we have neither, even though we have, striker aside, a decent mid table squad
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pinkie View PostIt cracks me up how you expect instant success with no funds and a rebuilding but with much younger players than we`ve probably ever had! we was in a mess wether you like or it or not, you act like we`re spending loads but that was done before, so what we`re doing nows had to be done, just how you expect us to be great when doing that straight aways unreal!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1973 ranger View PostThis myth of spending 250 million is a load of crap as our highest transfer fee was under 10 million up front so not going along with that
How many players bought on multi million pound deals over years?
How many millions spent on agents fees?
How many millions spent on paying off contracts to get people out of the club?
How many millions paid out on players however large or small?
How many millions on managers salaries and then paying them off too when sacked?
I think you're being a bit blinkered here.
It's pretty common knowledge.
Comment
Comment